Now, we’d like to interrupt our regular scheduled programming to discuss the (inevitable) demise of the Kardashian-Humphries union. Please comment, but do be polite. We won’t post any words like “famewhore” – it’s tacky. Honestly, we point the finger squarely at Mama Kris Jenner, but who are we to judge? I will say this – Kim Kardashian has a very powerful brand and work ethic. But marriages need effort, too, no matter how hard you work or how much you value money. And money she has – they MADE $17 million on the wedding and most of the vendors – and we know all of them – donated their services for press. Oy.
Did Kim love him? Was it arranged for E! and the cameras? Should she sell the ring and donate the money to charity? Is it because she didn’t want to move to Minneapolis? Why was she working on “brand Kim” in Dubai, and today in Australia with a brand spanking new marriage? Did tension between the families break them? Must she give back those gifts? Registry here, if you haven’t read it before. Wowza.
I wish everyone love in their marriage, but in watching the show, she seemed way more excited about the ring (well, come on!) than the idea of a marriage. He seems heartbroken and shocked. Sound off, people.
PS – I never did blog about the wedding, but suffice it to say, we at the office were not impressed. From her headpiece to the 1980’s black and white theme to the dresses, we did not love it. She should have walked down a black aisle runner to show off that veil. And I know the lovely aisle runner designer and she can do no wrong. The menu was simply and lovely, though, although some have sniped about them serving chicken (“The Cheaper Chicken” – “Father of the Bride”) as the main course. Again, give us your thoughts.